Posted On: October 22, 2008

Colorado Springs Criminal Defense Game - Spot The Violation, Take A Shot

I don’t really like watching legal shows on television. I don’t enjoy legal shows for the same reason many medical practitioners dislike “House”: they get everything wrong. Wrong legal decisions, wrong procedure, wrong ethics. Take last night’s episode of “Raising the Bar,” the new legal drama on TNT, for example. Every other minute one of the attorneys was committing a new ethical violation, without apparent consequence. Prosecute someone you don’t actually think is guilty? No problem. Trade away one client’s constitutional rights to benefit another client? Why not? Play a judicial role in your lover’s criminal matter? Yeah, okay, even the characters thought that one was taking it all a bit too far. While all that drama might make good material for a drinking game – spot the violation, take a shot – it creates frustrations for the practicing attorney.

Like it or not, people come into the real judicial system with expectations created by popular entertainment. Usually those expectations are way off base. As a deputy district attorney in the past and as a criminal defense attorney more recently, I’ve had to sit across the table from a victim, a witness, or someone accused of a crime and dispel those false expectations. And it ain’t easy to convince someone they don’t know what they “know.” You know?

For example, how many times has someone said to me, “The police officer didn’t read me my rights. Can I get my case dismissed?” Can you get your case dismissed? Well, maybe, but probably not, lots of emphasis on “probably not." It seems like every arrest on TV involves the officer reciting the suspect’s Miranda rights as he slaps the handcuffs on. Real life usually goes a little differently. According to the Supreme Court, the police do not have to read you your rights unless you are in custody and they intend to interrogate you. That means if you talked to the police out of custody – say, standing on the side of the road or at a friend’s house, for example – they don’t have to tell you that you have the right to remain silent. (Incidentally, if you don’t know by now that you have the right to remain silent, I suspect either you’re a recent immigrant or else there’s no hope for you). Also, if the police arrest you and don’t care to hear your side of the story, they don’t have to read you your Miranda rights as they haul you off to jail.

Continue reading " Colorado Springs Criminal Defense Game - Spot The Violation, Take A Shot " »

Posted On: October 21, 2008

What Is A Common Law Marriage?

Unlike the vast majority of states, the State of Colorado will allow parties to consider themselves "married" even though they have not obtained a marriage license or participated in a civil or religious ceremony formally consecrating their marital relationship.

A broad definition of the use of "Common Law" can be found on the Wikipedia site. Howver, the law in Colorado carefully defines a "common law" marriage as one where the "parties mutual consent or agree to be husband and wife, followed by a mutual and open assumption of a marital relationship."

The Colorado courts first recognized the existence of a common law marriage in a court decision in 1907. Therefore, the parties agreement that they are married, cohabitate as husband and wife, and engage in other conduct and circumstances that indicate that they have entered into a marital relationship, may be strong enough to convince a judge that the relationship should be treated by the law, the same as a ceremonial marriage. This is significant in light of the thousands of divorce and legal separation cases that are filed each year in the State of Colorado.

Continue reading " What Is A Common Law Marriage? " »